There’s a lot of hubbub about which camera is “the best”. Is it the 5DmkII? The FS100? The F3? My iPhone 4? Honestly, it’s hard for anyone to try and get a handle on all the cameras and specs with all the BS floating around. And I’m here to tell you it doesn’t matter.
I’m not going to pretend I’m an expert; infact, I’m quite the opposite. Barely a year out of my Bachelor of Film and Digital Media course and a handful of short films under my belt. Now I’m out in the big, bad world. As any creative person would tell you, to succeed you must do. Make things. Shoot things. Edit things. It’s the only way you’ll learn. So that’s what I’m doing.
The thing that bothers me though, is that every “filmmaker” with $1500 to spare, buys a DSLR and thinks his or her short film is going to be the next “The Social Network”. What I want to know is what happened to a good story? Without a good story (along with a quality script and actors) to back up your footage, you’re just left with some pretty pictures and shallow DOF. You may as well have shot meaningless vistas and timelapses and called it filmmaking.
Here’s an example: I know a guy who has a lot of money, and is into making films. He recently wrote and directed a short film and wanted to make it the best it could be. So he hired a RED One, got the whole thing professionally graded and mixed and entered it into festivals. It didn’t do well anywhere (and everyone who I’ve spoken to says much the same). I had a chat with him once, and the film came up in conversation so I asked him “Why don’t you think it worked for an audience?” and his reply was along the lines of “Well, I wrote it in a night, cast my friends as the actors and shot it that weekend. I don’t see why no one else gets it.”.
Over time it became very clear that the script was his baby. One draft with no feedback from others. But that’s all it was – a baby. No development, thought or time put into it. On set, all of his attention was devoted to the camera and getting a “film” look instead of working with the actors and getting good performances.
That story (and the myriad of others just like it) shows that technical wizardry doesn’t make a great film. Shooting on a DSLR isn’t going to save your script from plot holes and undevelopment. David O’Russell’s “The Fighter” was brilliant in my opinion. But because of the story and the performances. There’s no tricky camera work. No flashy special effects (I think from memory the title screen is Arial font over a shot).
Hollywood is filled with style over substance. Early reports for “Sucker Punch” say it’s a visual feast but so incoherent it’s not enjoyable. And everything has to be in 3D! But that’s another story.
My point is, early on, when you’re still learning and developing a style and a knack for filmmaking – the thing that will stand out is a well crafted story that people want to watch. It doesn’t matter what you shoot on. Sure, if you can afford it, shoot on RED. But only if it supports your story. Heck, shoot it on a JVC camcorder for $800! You could spend tens of thousands of dollars on cameras, rigs, lenses and more – but it will be useless if no one cares about your film.
You don’t buy a F1 racecar when you learn to drive. You get the shitty little bomb that costs more to insure than to buy and you learn with that. It does the same thing as the F1 car, but if you make a mistake, it’s not going to be expensive. And trust me, you will make mistakes. I’m the first one to admit that my films aren’t perfect, but I’m not deluding myself into thinking it was because of what they were shot on (16mm Kodak film if you’re wondering). It’s because of oversights with character development, pacing, plotting and the story that these films aren’t all they could have been. Don’t get me wrong, I’m immensely proud of them, but more so of what they have taught me.
To finish up, I want to apologise. This has been more of a ramble than a planned out argument, but I’m fine with that. As I said at the top of the post, there is a lot of BS out there and I wanted to share my thoughts on what DOES and really SHOULD matter.
I want to leave you with a short film that was made by a 17 year old (at the time of it’s completion). While yes, it was shot on a 7D, what makes the film so endearing and successful is its narrative. It has been featured in Nino Leitner’s blog, which also supports the idea that content > the camera it has been shot on. Enjoy.










